Friday, December 29, 2017

#StrongerTogether ! "The Tragedy of Susan Collins" Or, as I Like to Say -- GOP is GOP is GOP...



Focused Read in 4-6 minutes



"The Tragedy of Susan Collins"

By Dan Cluchey

(Author, lawyer, and former Obama Administration speechwriter and advisor from the state of Maine.)

Highlights, edited for reading at a glance follow below:

It is a national feeling of fear and frustration that could result in national suicide and the end of everything that we Americans hold dear. It is a condition that comes from the lack of effective leadership either in the legislative branch or the executive branch of our government… Mr. President, I speak as a Republican. I speak as a woman. I speak as a United States senator. I speak as an American.

Few citizens today will recall the name of Margaret Chase Smith, though she was as indispensable a lion of American politics as the post-war era had to offer.

 The first woman elected to both houses of Congress — and the first to have her name placed in nomination for the presidency by a major party — 

she ascended to civic stardom in the darkest days of the Red Scare when, on the first of June, 1950, she rose from her desk on the Senate floor to deliver what would come to be known as the Declaration of Conscience. 

In terms of scruples-per-minute, few pieces of rhetoric rate higher in American history; 

Smith’s speech pricked the veil of Republican complicity in McCarthyism and helped stir the nation to turn away a fascist tide.

A moderate Mainer, Margaret Chase Smith was swept from the GOP Olympus long ago. The party’s dead sprint rightward over the years has done as much as time to flush her memory from the modern Republican genome ...

In the decades since, Collins has spoken frequently about Smith’s impact on her life. From time to time, you can even spot her wearing the golden elephant pin — one of her “most treasured possessions” — bequeathed to her by Smith’s family after her death in 1995. Indeed, 

it is impossible to understand either the purpose of Senator Collins’s career, or the depths of its failure, without considering her relationship to Margaret Chase Smith.

… As Maine voters turn on her — and it has already begun — Collins will come to regret her swan dive into the depths of partisan depravity. Presented with a fresh McCarthy, she cowered where Smith stood tall. … “

You can read more of this insightful piece about Sen. Collins and, I would add, Republican political behavior in the 21st Century here


Focused Thought in 30 seconds



Focused Action in 30 seconds 



You can share the Tweet here 

Check out the brief video before you retweet it though, it's a must see making of 
THIS great political cartoon )


 by Darrin Bell

 You can see more of his work on his website here!


Focused Point of Interest in 3-4 minutes



National Democratic Redistricting Committee 

"NDRC 2017 Wrap-up and 2018 Preview

MEMORANDUM

To: Interested Parties

From: Kelly Ward, NDRC Executive Director

Date: December 22, 2017

Re: National Democratic Redistricting Committee Update

One year ago, we launched the National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC) to develop the first-ever comprehensive redistricting plan that can unrig Republican control over the redistricting process, undo gerrymandering and restore fairness to our democracy. I am proud to report that NDRC has had a very successful first year, with big plans for 2018 and beyond.

2017 Accomplishments

With no precedent for a comprehensive redistricting strategy, we set out to create a plan and start building the foundation for this work. Since no two states are the same, our model allows us to adapt and customize how we can be most effective in each state. The four pillars of our strategy include:

A robust litigation strategy in states with unconstitutional maps 

Reforming the redistricting process where possible, including supporting ballot initiatives to create fairer redistricting processes in the states 

Building the infrastructure needed for successful advocacy during the redistricting process in 2021, including raising public awareness, building a grassroots network, and developing state-of-the-art mapping software 

Electing Democrats in key state and local races that will play a role in the next round of redistricting 

With our model in place, we immediately and aggressively began executing on our work. We effectively established NDRC as the leading redistricting organization, created a strong financial foundation, launched initial programmatic activity in key strategy areas, and began building a strong grassroots network around the country.

In 2017, we worked to advance our goals around the country by:

Raising more than $11 million for NDRC and our affiliated-organizations, the National Redistricting Action Fund (501c4) and the National Redistricting Foundation (501c3),

Helping to elect Ralph Northam and Democratic legislators down the ballot in Virginia by investing $1.2 million. For the first time since 1991, Virginia will have a Democratic governor with veto power over the redistricting process,

Investing $50,000 in a local campaign to protect three state Senators from a brazen partisan recall attempt in Nevada. These recalls are an attempt by Republicans to flip the majority in the Nevada state Senate,

Generating extensive local and national press coverage about the damaging effects of gerrymandering and NDRC’s plan to achieve fair maps,

Pursuing active lawsuits in 5 states, including Pennsylvania, Texas, North Carolina, Virginia, and Georgia,

Launching a partnership with Organizing For Action (OFA), which included NDRC Chairman Eric Holder digitally joining more than 60 grassroots house parties around the country, and

Building a robust and extensive grassroots email network that both supports us financially and engages on redistricting issues nationally and in the states. ... "

You can read more about plans for 2018 and Beyond here

.
.
.

 Direct sources for Democrats:

* ( Personal favored and most informative follows are shared here with the understanding that readers will always apply their own critical thinking to any information provided anywhere by anyone.  #StrongerTogether does not share sources of information lightly but -- no one is perfect! -- so always #DistrustAndVerify I am using a star rating that is strictly based on my situational experience with the work of the media personality specifically in relation to issues of interest to me. )


The Democratic Party Website

The Democratic Party on Facebook

The Democratic Party on Twitter


Also

C-SPAN (a good place for speeches & hearings direct source (s))


 Fact checking organizations courtesy of the Society of Professional Journalists 

in alphabetical order...












( You can read more on fact checking here )


 Some of my favorite, most informative
 follows on Twitter include:


⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ US Intelligence | Author | Navy Senior Chief | NBC/MSNBC
⭐⭐⭐ Federal Government Operations | Vanity Fair | Newsweek | MSNBC Contributor | Author
⭐⭐⭐⭐ Voting Rights/Voter Suppression | Author | Mother Jones 


⭐⭐⭐⭐ You can find Verrit:"Media for the 65.8M" here


 Some of the most credible media -- at the moment:


📰📰📰 Mother Jones

📰📰📰 The Washington Post

📰📰📰 The New York Times

💻💻💻 News And Guts on Facebook


 Some of the most credible Talking Heads -- at the moment -- and their Twitter handles:


📺📺📺 Rachel Maddow on MSNBC

📺📺📺📺📺 AM w/Joy Reid on MSNBC


📺📺 Chris Cuomo on CNN

📺📺📺 The Beat With Ari on MSNBC

📺📺📺 Velshi & Ruhle on MSNBC


⬆⬆⬆ Wallace is new to the job but for right now
 her work on Trump GOP has been credible, IMO)



...for Networking for Democrats today!

.
.
.


(Linked) "...is our 2016 platform...a declaration of how we plan to move America forward. Democrats believe that cooperation is better than conflict, unity is better than division, empowerment is better than resentment, and bridges are better than walls.

It’s a simple but powerful idea: We are stronger together."

You can read the Platform here


Focused Monthly Inspiration 




  (Remember 2018...)

   
 *

Curated by Gail Mountain, with occasional personal commentary, Network For #StrongerTogether ! is not affiliated with The Democratic Party in any capacity. This is an independent blog and the hope is you will, at a glance, learn more about the Party and you will, with a click or two, also take action on its behalf as it is provided!

( You can also find me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/GKMTNtwits )


  *



See the League of Women Voters website:

 Vote411 here 


Thank you for focusing!

g., aka Focused Democrat

✊ Resisting "Fake News"

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

#StrongerTogether ! “Collusion Doesn’t Have to be Criminal to be an Ongoing Threat”



Focused Read in 3-4 minutes



“Collusion Doesn’t Have to be Criminal to be an Ongoing Threat”

( First, what you need to know about the authors of the Dec. 15th article, which establishes some level of credibility in the context of the subject matter:

“Alex Finley former officer of the CIA’s Directorate of Operations, where she served in West Africa and Europe. She is the author of Victor in the Rubble, a satire about the CIA and the War on Terror.

Asha Rangappa, Senior Lecturer at Yale’s Jackson Institute for Global Affairs. She served as an FBI counterintelligence agent from 2002 to 2005.

John Sipher, Director of Customer Success at CrossLead, Retired Member of the CIA’s Senior Intelligence Service.” )

Highlights of the article follow

During the hearing with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein on Wednesday, some members of the House Judiciary Committee did not try to conceal their attempt to discredit and derail Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation...

The way that the Russia investigation has been framed has made it easy for them to do that: Its legitimacy appears to rest on finding a smoking gun of criminality – a simple yes or no on whether any of the cast of characters in this saga committed a serious federal offence.

But making this merely about the bright line between illegality (criminality) and legality means that most Americans are missing what is right under our noses.

 To wit, there is no question that Russia made multiple, unprecedented attempts to penetrate a U.S. presidential campaign, that its approaches were not rebuffed, and that its contacts were sensitive enough that everyone, to a person, has concealed them.

These facts might never be adjudicated inside a courtroom – they may not even be illegal – but they present a clear and present national security threat that we cannot ignore. 

We write here to broaden the public understanding of that security threat, and to underscore why the principal part of Mueller’s investigation—which is a counterintelligence probe not a criminal one—is performing a vital role for our country.

Assets: Tools In A Toolbox

Russia’s intelligence services, like any intelligence service worth its salt, aims to recruit a variety of assets (a.k.a. sources). Assets are a spy’s version of a “toolbox.” ... 

A Russian Courtship

From an intelligence standpoint, the numerous Russian approaches to the Trump campaign look like a textbook recruitment effort.

 Campaign officials were an attractive target for Russian intelligence, of course. They provided a chance to catapult Russian influence into the Oval Office, and to obtain the Holy Grail: to manipulate a sitting presidential administration to act in a way that is favorable to Russia.

(And even if their candidate did not make it into the White House, they would have a grip on him and some of his most powerful associates for years to come.)

...The sheer number of Russia’s attempted contacts with the highest level of a U.S. presidential campaign and then transition team is mind-boggling...And those are only the contacts we know about...

The Pattern of Deception

By accepting certain meetings, members of the Trump team communicated that they were indeed interested in having a relationship. ...

Here’s where the deception on the part of Trump and his team is telling. 

Trump and his crew never, not once, considered reporting Russian approaches to their campaign, even after law enforcement and intelligence officials made it public that Russia had attempted to interfere with the election. 

Rather, at every turn, they encouraged unethical behavior and misled the American people, Congress, and even the FBI, claiming repeatedly they had nothing to do with Russia or Russians – even as evidence continues to surface that reveals otherwise.

Further, since taking office, the Trump administration has strenuously resisted taking any action against Russia for its attack on our democratic process. In fact, the President continues to call the intelligence community’s assessment a “hoax” and has taken no meaningful steps to protect against further interference in the future.

 President Trump even went as far as trying to return Russia’s spy compounds which were confiscated by the Obama administration as a part of its sanctions. Even after Congress passed a bill reinforcing sanctions against Russia this past August, the Trump administration has yet to enforce them.

This inexplicable policy position, combined with the administration’s pattern of deception, suggests two explanations (which are not mutually exclusive):

 The first is that Russia’s relationship with at least some members of the campaign did proceed, and involved ethically or legally questionable activities that the campaign needs to conceal. 

Second, it may be that members of the Trump campaign have engaged in problematic activities known to Russia – related or unrelated to the election itself – which Russia now holds as a sword of Damocles over them. 

Either way, it strongly suggests that Russia could have leverage over those who are now in charge of protecting the United States, rendering them unable to act solely in the interest of our country.

Is Collusion a Crime?

Most of the things intelligence officers and assets do—particularly during the process of recruiting someone—aren’t necessarily illegal...

This isn’t to say that Mueller won’t find evidence of criminal acts in his investigation. 

Based on the indictments and plea deals we’ve seen so far, it’s clear that at least some of the people associated with the Trump campaign have committed crimes.

 But the U.S. criminal code is narrow: It encompasses specific activities like computer hacking, or money laundering, or lying to federal agents. Mueller will also proceed cautiously, only bringing charges where both the law and evidence are extraordinarily clear.

 What becomes public through the criminal justice system, then, will only be a sliver of what actually took place between Russia and the Trump campaign behind the scenes.

The only crime that might reveal a larger effort is conspiracy, which is an agreement among two or more people to commit a crime. But it’s unlikely that there would be evidence of an explicit quid pro quo in the intelligence world. 

This is because intelligence operations are “compartmentalized”—that is, each asset only knows their own role, but not necessarily to what extent others might be involved – so no one asset would understand or know the full breadth of an entire operation. ...

But the truth is that “collusion” with the Kremlin doesn’t have to be criminal to be dangerous.

 If the Trump campaign received offers of assistance from Russia, and they did nothing to discourage that help (or even encouraged it), they are indebted to a foreign adversary whose national interests are opposed to those of the United States. 

You can be sure that at some point, Putin will come to collect, if he has not done so already – 

and when it comes to protecting our democracy the administration will be a puppet of a foreign adversary, not our country’s first line of defense.

 While the potential criminal aspects of this case need to be investigated, we need to take a good look at what we already know. 

The national security threat is staring us right in the face.

You can read more here  


Focused Thought in 30 seconds




Focused Action in 30 seconds



You can share this Tweet here

You can read the article here

(And I highly recommend it to activists in America...)

( Courtesy of ThinkProgress )

.
.
.

 Direct sources for Democrats:

* ( Personal favored and most informative follows are shared here with the understanding that readers will always apply their own critical thinking to any information provided anywhere by anyone.  #StrongerTogether does not share sources of information lightly but -- no one is perfect! -- so always #DistrustAndVerify I am using a star rating that is strictly based on my situational experience with the work of the media personality specifically in relation to issues of interest to me. )


The Democratic Party Website

The Democratic Party on Facebook

The Democratic Party on Twitter


Also

C-SPAN (a good place for speeches & hearings direct source (s))


 Fact checking organizations courtesy of the Society of Professional Journalists 

in alphabetical order...












( You can read more on fact checking here )


 Some of my favorite, most informative
 follows on Twitter include:


⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ US Intelligence | Author | Navy Senior Chief | NBC/MSNBC
⭐⭐⭐ Federal Government Operations | Vanity Fair | Newsweek | MSNBC Contributor | Author
⭐⭐⭐⭐ Voting Rights/Voter Suppression | Author | Mother Jones 


⭐⭐⭐⭐ You can find Verrit:"Media for the 65.8M" here


 Some of the most credible media -- at the moment:


📰📰📰 Mother Jones

📰📰📰 The Washington Post

📰📰📰 The New York Times

💻💻💻 News And Guts on Facebook


 Some of the most credible Talking Heads -- at the moment -- and their Twitter handles:


📺📺📺 Rachel Maddow on MSNBC

📺📺📺📺📺 AM w/Joy Reid on MSNBC


📺📺 Chris Cuomo on CNN

📺📺📺 The Beat With Ari on MSNBC

📺📺📺 Velshi & Ruhle on MSNBC


⬆⬆⬆ Wallace is new to the job but for right now
 her work on Trump GOP has been credible, IMO)



...for Networking for Democrats today!

.
.
.


(Linked) "...is our 2016 platform...a declaration of how we plan to move America forward. Democrats believe that cooperation is better than conflict, unity is better than division, empowerment is better than resentment, and bridges are better than walls.

It’s a simple but powerful idea: We are stronger together."

You can read the Platform here


Focused Monthly Inspiration 




  (Remember 2018...)

   
 *

Curated by Gail Mountain, with occasional personal commentary, Network For #StrongerTogether ! is not affiliated with The Democratic Party in any capacity. This is an independent blog and the hope is you will, at a glance, learn more about the Party and you will, with a click or two, also take action on its behalf as it is provided!

( You can also find me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/GKMTNtwits )


  *



See the League of Women Voters website:

 Vote411 here 


Thank you for focusing!

g., aka Focused Democrat

✊ Resisting "Fake News"