Friday, April 21, 2017

#StrongerTogether ! A Window into an insider's Thoughts on Hillary's Campaign * OR: Can "reporting" without the Input of the Subject of the Reporting Really be Credible? *





Focused Read in 3 minutes


A mix of Hillary staff, supporters and friends courtesy of the author's () Facebook page!

“Shattered” or Contorted? What a New Book Gets Wrong about the Clinton Campaign

by Christina Reynolds

(Proud Obama and Hillary alum. Tar Heel. Marine brat. Feminist...Opinions are my own.)

I’m not writing to debate where the blame lies for the loss. While I’ve certainly got opinions (and a list of my own mistakes I’d love to take back), I’ll leave that debate to the media. And I’m not here to fact check, except to note that contrary to the book, I was not the research director — that was a talented man named Tony Carrk who led a terrific team.

I wanted to speak out because after spending most of the campaign watching some people question the enthusiasm and our supporters, it’s hard to read a depiction of the campaign that paints a dedicated, cohesive team as mercenaries with questionable motives who lacked a loyalty to a candidate described as “imperial” and removed from the campaign.

That’s just not the campaign, the staff or the candidate I was in the trenches with for 18 months. …

You can read the piece in its entirety here


Focused Thought in 90 seconds

  
 Fact:
 Hillary won the popular vote in the 2016 Primary 55.2% to 43.1%

 Fact:
 Hillary won the popular vote in the 2016 General Election 48.2% to 46.1%

Three suggested questions to factor into YOUR assessing of non-Hillary critiques into her campaign:

ONE 

Could it really have been that bad if Hillary won the popular vote -- twice?

TWO

Can credible assessments of Hillary's campaign be made by authors "reconstructing decisions and unseized opportunities," read that as imagining?

THREE

Can fair and balanced reporting and analysis actually happen without the input of the subject matter of the reporting?


Focused Action in 30 seconds

  
Take an action of your choice today to benefit the Democratic Party and the future of America today!


.
.
.


Direct sources for Democrats:

(Shared sources come with the understanding readers will apply their own critical thinking to the information they consume. #StrongerTogether does not share lightly but -- no one is perfect!)

The Democratic Party Website

The Democratic Party on Facebook

The Democratic Party on Twitter

C-SPAN (a good place for speeches & hearings direct source (s))




Thank you for Networking for Democrats today!


.
.
.



(Linked) "...is our 2016 platform...a declaration of how we plan to move America forward. Democrats believe that cooperation is better than conflict, unity is better than division, empowerment is better than resentment, and bridges are better than walls.

It’s a simple but powerful idea: We are stronger together."

You can read the Platform here


    ( #Rmber2018 💮 )


  *


Curated by Gail Mountain, interspersed with personal commentary on occasion, Network For #StrongerTogether ! is not affiliated with The Democratic Party in any capacity. This is an independent blog and the hope is you will, at a glance, learn more about the Democratic Party and you will, with a click or two, also take action on its behalf as it is provided! You can read more Network For #StrongerTogether posts here:   https://networkstrongertogether.blogspot.com/

( You can also find me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/GKMTNtwits )


  *


 

No comments: